Back to Main Page Week 1 at Cleveland Week 2 at Baltimore Week 3 vs. Seattle Week 4 vs. Jacksonville Week 5 at Buffalo Week 6 at Cincinnati Week 7 vs. Atlanta Week 8 BYE Week 9 at San Fran Week 10 vs. Cleveland Week 11 at Tennessee Week 12 vs. Cincinnati Week 13 at Jacksonville Week 14 vs. Baltimore Week 15 at Kansas City Week 16 vs. Carolina Week 17 vs. Tennessee Here We Go! Post-Season 
|
Pittsburgh at Cleveland (43-0) A. The player takes the dishes out of the sink before he pisses in it. Later - keep up the great work! dsycks Mike DeLancey Mike's Steeler Gridiron Tommy Coleman (a.k.a., Fleetwood & Julio) This is not a question ,as "Eyes Knows use is!" Uh-oh, I'm slipping into Game-Day Eve Fly-Negro mode! Dig! Or, as Link used to always say on the Mod Squad, "SOLID"! September 12th, 1999 prediction: 45-0 = "A Burnt Piece of Pumpkin Pie in Carmen Policy's Eye!" Tim, your preemptive Brownie warning to the Clown's Fans is "Right On"! I couldn't have said it better myself, even after,spending the whole night drinking Daiquiries and smoking Banana Peels with Flee 'n' Jules! You deserve a raise, brother! I can smell blood and Clown paint! Tommy Bruce Hicks 1. Find and follow another _______ team. 2. Try to remember; no matter how good you are and how bad Cincy is; you guys still need prayers and hand grenades to beat them. 3. Keep supporting "Slash" as you opine on Couch developing into a "bust." 4. Learn to punctuate so you can end your interminable run-on sentences. 5. Get a thesaurus! Since you're determined to use "suck" so much; find some alternatives. 6. At the end of every Browns game I may end up a "loser,' but Steelers fans are losers regardless the score of their games. 7. The end of this season's opening Steeler game is likely to be the same as it has been for the past several years. 8. Since you reminded us of the '79 game; let me remind you of the '89 game. My warmest regards and say hi to Cincy on your way to the AFC Central cellar Bruce P.S.---Oh, how about a friendly wager? If you win, I'll post an ode to the "great Steelers;" if you lose, you have to post a cartoon I created that features our teams. P.P.S.-- I forgot to mention: although you're a _________ Steelers fan, you happen to have a beautiful wife and child. My condolences to them :-) Qyetzie First, the big game, September 12th. Good chance it will be shown at a home near you for those in P-burgh without televisions so make sure to catch it. I say that because of all the 'pregame guesses' that I've read here NONE seem to take into effect the "Cowher slow starter" enigma that's been going on in the "Squeel City" for the past few years. Anyone out there wish to dive in and get some stats on how quickly your team has leapt to a 4-0 start? 3-1 start? Fact is, during Cowher's regime the Steelers have started rather slowly. This includes (especially) years in which the team 'begins anew' with a different offensive coordinator- not unlike 99'. What was that... 7 wins last year? NICE offense there guys! Which brings me to something entirely relevant. It WAS NOT your offensive coordinator's fault for the meager offensive production last year. Here's a hint: IT WAS YOUR QUARTERBACK. In the height of the 'Oh crap- well, just blame Sherman' saga it seems as if most Pittsburgh loyalists jumped on the goat train to completely deny the fact that their QB is suffering from a terrible lack of confidence. Defenses were ready for Kordell last year- and will be this year as well. I'd be shocked if he doesn't have something broken by a LB by midseason. Flush him out- pound him down. You watch. Incidentally, NICE jab at the Browns 'Brownie' mascot that hasn't been around for nearly 35 years. Seems to me, those in glass houses with a sexuality challenged QB should not be throwing stones at an outdated mascot. Then again the fact that you Pittsburgh folk have even REMEMBERED something past 1974 has me astonished in the first place. I'm proud of ya. The Browns (like it or not) DO have some talent on the field. Granted- that talent has yet to play an entire game together, but by midseason they'll be coming along just fine. Most folks here think five wins is entirely possible in the 'expansion friendly' AFC Central. Remember, the Squeelas last year were a decent long-snapper and a few odd breaks away from five wins. While B-more may be nice enough to give you games, we're back to take them back away. Oh! Nice run about the Bungles! Every prediction I hear out of P-burghers about the Browns taking two from the 'ever so lowly' Bengals busts me up. Tell me, if the Bungles are so terrible, how DID they get two of their wins last year? Without the STEELERS that team wins only ONE game! AHAHAHAA! Nice one! Squeeler fans are the ONLY folks dumb enough to criticize a team that SWEPT THEIR YELLOW AND BLACK ARSES last year! That is SO rich. Once again, the P-Burgh memory crisis strikes again as the truth makes itself mysteriously evasive for those living near three sewers. As far as the first game goes I think the Browns will employ the "single" wide-out coverage'. Meaning simply that the Browns will only cover one of your receivers since the likelihood of Kordell FINDING the other is about 10% per play. The other 90% of the time you'll be able to watch your QB run around hopelessly looking for free green to run more too only to find an orange helmet planted deeply into his chest cavity. You'll also find running the ball will be fairly difficult since the Browns front seven is already being considered one of the best (if not THE best) in the division. Your O-line is nothing compared to what it used to be- but at least NOW you won't be able to blame Sherman anymore. So, don't go wondering why what used to be 5-6 yard carries are now 1-2 yarders. For the future- you'll LOVE Tim Couch. Knowing that you'll have to face him 20 or so times over the next decade or so just relish the fact that this game may be the ONLY game in which TC doesn't get time to carve up your excuse for a defensive secondary. Final score: Browns 21 / Squeelas 13. Close, but not close enough P-Burgh. Welcome back to the reality of the AFC Central. We missed you too. Qyetzie Browns:TNG http://BrownsTNG.com A virtual community for Browns fans Tommy Coleman (a.k.a., Fleetwood & Julio) ClownsFans sounds like a 1999 reprise of a "siamese dream." A clue:"_______"x 2 = another Black 'n' Gold broom sweep'N you! Tommy, Steeler Nation P.S. -- Tim, the Bungles give a bad name to "sucking." However, they did win 3 games in 1998, so I won't lob 'em a duck ball over the plate. Keep this in mind, though... every time someone in Pittsburgh flushes the toilet, somebody's water-bill goes up in "Cinn City." (The mighty Ohio River!) Tom Bragg http://community.webtv.net/francoharris/TomsPittsburgh People, they have no players. Even in the Steelers' current state of disrepair, I doubt there is even ONE Brown who could crack our starting lineup. I hear everyone talking "potential," and it may indeed be there... yes, Tim Couch could very well go on to greatness (although my personal opinion is that he'll ultimately be a bust)... yes, they've installed a quality front office... yes, owner Al Lerner has more money than God... but as of right now, these guys SUCK. I'll give credit to Browns fans... they are supremely loyal to their team, win or lose. When it comes to intelligence, however (not to mention opinions based in reality), they're just a "wee bit" lacking. Consider the fact that a Browns-loving co-worker bet me $20 that the Browns will make the playoffs this year. I'll never make an easier 20 bucks. Listen, Brownies... take the stupid dawg bowls off your heads, take the dawg bones out of your... er, mouths... pack away those idiotic dawg masks till Halloween (even though they're often an improvement when worn by female fans), and please put that fat-ass "Big Dawg" on the Slim Fast plan, because the Browns are going NOWHERE this year. Why? Because (sing along with me, bruthas) THESE GUYS SUCK! Face it... the Browns are a 4-12 team, and they only get that much credit because they get to face the Bengals twice this year. Speaking of the Bengals, THOSE guys SUCK, too! Later! Tim McMillen SEND US Your Comments!
Back to Main Page |